Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A34's 82.9 general score. IPhone X counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A34, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone X features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The iPhone X has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera and a way tinier sensor shooting way worse quality videos and photos, they both have a same size camera aperture.
IPhone X has a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A34 features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.