Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A34, with an 84.2 score against 82.9. The iPhone XS has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel density and a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
IPhone XS has as much memory for apps and games as the Galaxy A34, both have equal 64 GB internal memory. Apple iPhone XS counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A34, because although it has lesser and slower cpu cores, and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot smaller sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Galaxy A34 features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.