Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is a bit better than the HTC One M9, having a overall score of 82.9 against 77.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A34 has the newer 13 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it offers a couple additional features. The Galaxy A34 body is way thinner and extremely lighter than HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. The HTC One M9 counts with a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A34, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 128 GB.
The HTC One M9 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A34, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an additional graphics co-processor. HTC One M9 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A34, although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality photographs, a much less megapixels camera in the back and a tinier diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A34 has a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.