Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra, getting a global score of 82.9 against 77. Galaxy A34 is a incredibly thinner and extremely lighter cellphone than the HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch.
The HTC U Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A34, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A34 counts with a little faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A34 also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Galaxy A34 has a much longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra has a camera that's just as good as the Galaxy A34 one, and although the HTC U Ultra has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.