Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-11 |
| -- | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy A34, with a overall score of 84.3 against 82.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A34 has Android 13. The LG G8 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG G8 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better pixel quantity per inch of display. The LG G8 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in low-light situations.
LG G8 ThinQ features a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A34 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.