| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| -- | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.14 ounces |
| -- | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The LG K92 is a bit better than Galaxy A34, getting a overall score of 85.4 against 82.9. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but LG K92 has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A34 has Android 13. Galaxy A34 has just a bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A34 also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A34 has a little faster processing unit than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The LG K92 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG K92 has a much better camera than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same aperture and the same sensor size, the LG K92 also has a camera with lot more mega pixels. The Galaxy A34 counts with greater battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.