Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-10-01 |
| -- | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the LG V10's 78.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy A34's design is thinner and noticeably lighter than the LG V10. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A34 has the newer 13 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, providing the user some additional features.
Galaxy A34 counts with a faster CPU than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A34 also has a larger number of cores. LG V10 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The LG V10 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V10 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V10 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing way lower quality videos and images, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A34 has a very superior battery life than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.