Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-09 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a general score of 82.9 against 82.5. Both devices we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A34 has older 13 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy A34's construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than the LG V30S ThinQ.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and more pixels per screen inch. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A34, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG V30S ThinQ's CPU is just as good as the Galaxy A34 one, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a way better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity. LG V30S ThinQ's camera is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A34 one, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a way worse 16 megapixels resolution camera and a way tinier back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.