Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ, having a score of 82.9 against 81.3. The Galaxy A34 is a thinner and incredibly lighter device than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better pixel number in each inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A34, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A34, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor taking way worse quality videos and photographs and a lot lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations.
Galaxy A34 has a way better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.