Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's overall score of 81.2. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A34 has a more recent 13 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a a lot thinner and way lighter cellphone than the LG V40 ThinQ.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A34 has a much longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a much worse resolution back camera and a much smaller sensor capturing lot worse quality photographs, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.