Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is just a bit better than Galaxy A34, with a overall score of 87.1 against 82.9. LG Velvet has a display that's just as good as Galaxy A34's screen, because although the LG Velvet has a just a bit lower pixel count per screen inch, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a little faster CPU than LG Velvet, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A34 has longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh. The LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A34. Both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same diafragm aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.