Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A34, getting a score of 87.1 against 82.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A34 has Android 13, providing the user some nice extra features. Galaxy A34 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little worse screen pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A34 features just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.