Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| -- | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is slightly better than Moto G 5G, having a general score of 82.9 against 81.5. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A34 has newer 13 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy A34 design is much lighter and notably thinner than Moto G 5G.
The Galaxy A34 features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A34 has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A34 also counts with a bit higher screen pixel density.
Moto G 5G features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Moto G 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a 48 megapixels resolution camera, the Moto G 5G also has a bigger camera aperture.
Motorola Moto G 5G's battery performance is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A34 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.