Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| -- | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy A34, with a overall score of 86.2 against 82.9. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A34 has Android 13 version. Galaxy A34 and Moto G200 5G both count with quite similar screens, because although the Moto G200 5G has a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. Moto G200 5G features a greater camera than Galaxy A34, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a camera with a way better resolution.
The Moto G200 5G has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a battery life that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A34's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.