Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| -- | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is a bit better than Moto G60s, getting a global score of 82.9 against 79.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A34 has a more recent 13 version and Moto G60s has Android 11 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy A34 body is notably lighter and much thinner than the Moto G60s.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A34 has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G60s. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution. The Moto G60s counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto G60s's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy A34's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.