Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| -- | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Galaxy A34's construction is noticeably thinner and notably lighter than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A34 has the previous 13 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Galaxy A34 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A34 also has a greater number of cores. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A34, although it has a much less mega pixels back-facing camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Galaxy A34 counts with a very superior battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.