Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-16 |
| -- | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a global score of 82.9 against 77.6. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Galaxy A34 has the previous 13 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A34 is a notably lighter and much thinner phone than the Motorola Moto Z3.
Galaxy A34 and Moto Z3 have very similar screens, because although the Moto Z3 has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density. The Moto Z3 features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A34 has a little bit better processing power than Moto Z3. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy A34 counts with a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A34 captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z3, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos, a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera and a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.