Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A34's score of 82.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A34 has Android 13. The Galaxy A34 features a little sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit larger display, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a processor that's just as good as the processor in Samsung Galaxy A34, and although the Motorola razr (2020) has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A34, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A34 has a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79 percent bigger battery size. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.