Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A34's score of 82.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A34 has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A50s, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s and Samsung Galaxy A34 have really similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density. The Galaxy A50s has a superior camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a 48 mega pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A34 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.