Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| -- | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than the Galaxy A34, having a 97.6 score against 82.9. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A34 has Android 13 version, counting with some extra features. Galaxy A34 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
Galaxy Fold has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution and a much tinier back camera sensor, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography.
Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.