Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A34's score of 82.9. Both of these phones use the same Android 13 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a little higher amount of pixels in each inch of display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a much larger sensor. The Galaxy A34 features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.