Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note 3's overall score of 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy A34 design is a lot lighter and notably thinner than the Galaxy Note 3. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A34 has 13 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A34, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a bit worse pixel amount per display inch and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A34, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 64 GB.
The Galaxy A34 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.