Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5, with an 82.9 score against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy A34 body is way lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy Note 5. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A34 has the newer 13 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it gives lots of additional features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A34 also has a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy Note 5 features a much better display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a much smaller sensor shooting lot lower quality videos and pictures, a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs in low-light situations and a lot lower 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy Note 5 and Galaxy A34 count with similar memory capacity for apps and games, both of them have the same internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.