Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-23 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A34, getting a general score of 89 against 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy A34 and the Galaxy Note10 have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note10 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM. Galaxy Note10 features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Note10 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution and a lot smaller sensor capturing much worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
The Galaxy A34 has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.