Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A34, getting a global score of 98 against 82.9. These devices have the same Android 13 operating system, so both of them should give you the same operating system features. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a little bigger display, a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A34 and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G feature really similar battery performance. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.