Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| -- | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A34, having a score of 95.4 against 82.9. Both of these devices come with the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a greater pixels density, a little larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Galaxy A34 and the Galaxy S22 Ultra count with similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.