Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-07-30 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| -- | 8.32 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is slightly better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, getting an 82.9 score against 82.2. Samsung Galaxy A34's body is notably thinner and notably lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 2160 x 3840 resolution and much more pixels per inch of display. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 400 GB.
Galaxy A34 counts with a superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality and a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.