Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-04-21 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy A34, having a general score of 93.1 against 82.9. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 features just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy A34, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.