Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-08-20 |
| -- | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting an 82.9 score against 82.7. Galaxy A34's body is incredibly thinner and much lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy A34 has a newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, offering some additional features and increased performance.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better performance than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A34. Both of them have the same sensor size, a F1.8 aperture and a 48 MP resolution camera. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A34 features better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.