Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-09 |
| -- | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.20 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, having an 82.9 score against 80.6. Galaxy A34's design is lighter and extremely thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A34 has 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has Android 11, so it counts with some additional features.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A34, although it has a just a little worse pixels number per inch in the screen, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display. Galaxy A34 features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy A34 and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite count with similar storage to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has just a little better battery life than Galaxy A34, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.