Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| -- | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A34's score of 82.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A34 has Android 13. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A34 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent larger battery size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy A34, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.