Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting an 82.9 score against 76.6. The Galaxy A34 body is extremely lighter and noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A34 has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy A34 has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a just a bit better screen pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger display. Galaxy A34 has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A34 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's battery lifetime is very similar to Galaxy A34's battery life, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A34. They have a same size sensor, a same size aperture and a 48 mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.