Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 overall score. The Galaxy A34 is a way lighter and extremely thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A34 has newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy A34 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A34 also counts with a just a little better pixel number per inch in the display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery duration is very similar to the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy A34, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a larger sensor and a camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.