Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having an 82.9 score against 79. The Galaxy A34 is a extremely lighter and extremely thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A34 has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, so it counts with a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A34 also counts with a little bit better display density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A34 counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Galaxy A34 one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 0 percent larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A34. They have a F1.8 aperture, the same sensor size and the same resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.