Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has an overall score of 85.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G comes with Android 14 operating system. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a just a little heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but they have the same thickness.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has just a bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688 and much more brightness.
Galaxy A35 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A35 5G counts with longer battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 26% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.