Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having a global score of 92.8 against 79.4. IPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with Android 14 OS. Although iPhone 12 Pro is incredibly older than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner.
IPhone 12 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display density, a much brighter screen and a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro and Galaxy A35 5G both feature quite similar storage for applications and games, they have the same internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G captures much better photographs and videos than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light images and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 78 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.