Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 global score. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a older and a little heavier phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Apple managed to build it just a little thinner anyway. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A35 5G comes with Android 14 OS.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a just a bit higher pixels quantity per inch of screen, a bit larger display, a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels and a really brighter display. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Galaxy A35 5G, both of them have exactly the same internal memory.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a way better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less cores (although they are faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Galaxy A35 5G features superior battery lifetime than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 36% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much better camera than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.