Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a 93.3 score against 79.4. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A35 5G counts with Android 14 OS. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much older than the Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone 13 Pro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch of screen, much more brightness and a slightly better 1170 x 2532 resolution.
Galaxy A35 5G captures much better photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
The iPhone 13 Pro's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to Galaxy A35 5G's one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A35 5G has a superior battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.