Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is slightly better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a global score of 87.1 against 79.4. The iPhone 8 Plus is an extremely older device than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it's a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 8 Plus has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little brighter screen and a bit higher pixels density. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has an 86 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.