Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 79.4. The Apple iPhone X construction is lighter and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. The Apple iPhone X has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater display density, a quite brighter screen and a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution.
IPhone X features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. IPhone X has an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a superior camera than iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot more megapixels camera.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a much better battery life than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.