Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. The Apple iPhone XR is a way older and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but Apple made it just a bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has way less brightness, it also counts with a better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a little bit more pixels per display inch and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The iPhone XR features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A35 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.