Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is slightly better than Galaxy A35 5G, having a overall score of 84.2 against 79.4. Apple iPhone XS is an much older cellphone than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more brightness, a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone XS has a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 2 less processing cores and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an 88% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.