Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-12-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s overall score of 77.4. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Galaxy A35 5G is somewhat heavier than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), it's just a little bit thinner and also a lot newer.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and less bright display, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per display inch.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 5G and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) have similar batteries duration.
The Galaxy A35 5G takes much better videos and photos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.