Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released 7 years before. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 2 XL features as much memory for games and applications as the Galaxy A35 5G one, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A35 5G features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A35 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.