Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G's overall score of 79.4. Although the Google Pixel 3 is extremely older than Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is just a little bit thinner and much lighter. Google Pixel 3 has a display that is just as good as the screen in Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although the Google Pixel 3 has a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 3 has a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A35 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much bigger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A35 5G features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.