Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46% greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.