Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, having a 79.4 score against 78.9. The Galaxy A35 5G design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is a lot heavier. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit larger screen. Galaxy A35 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy A35 5G has superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.