Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 score. Google Pixel 4's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is incredibly lighter. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A35 5G features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.