Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. Google Pixel 4 XL's design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it's just a bit lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a very superior performance than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G features superior battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.