Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Galaxy A35 5G, getting an 87.5 score against 79.4. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it is lighter. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a very superior performance than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A35 5G has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G have really similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Galaxy A35 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.